Upon Further (Appellate) Review ...

In Craig v. Craig (Opinion No. 25970), the S.C. Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals, which reversed the family court order to sell the marital home and increased the amount of alimony. The Court held that the family court erred in not considering factors relating to the desirability of maintaining the marital home when it apportioned the estate.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
nunzio bagliere - October 15, 2007 11:41 AM

I LEFT MY HEART IN SANFRANCISCO WHEM MY EX WIFE DROVE ME HOME ONE MORNING AFTER 35 YEARS OF MARRIAGE AND SAID " HONEY SWEETEE I WILL BE RIGHT BACK I AM GOING TO THE STORE " AS I WALKED IN TO A VACATED HOUSE AND BEING DISABLED . THANKS NEW YORK TO PROTECT THE DISABLED FOR NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT JUDGE HAS ORDERED HER TO PAY ME ALIMONY FOR LIFE UNTILL SHE RETIRES THEN I AM GRANTED RIGHTS OF HER PENSION !!! TO ALL LADIES WHO DIG FOR GOLD OR ALL MEN WHO ARE LEFT OUT E MAIL YOUR RESPONSE TO NUNZIO7@VERIZON.NET FROM NUNZIO BAGLIERE SYRACUSE N.Y.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?