Close X

J. Benjamin Stevens is now part of Offit Kurman.

Read More

Looking for Jenny Stevens?

Please visit her website using the button below.

View Website


Disclosure of Text Messages During Divorce

Posted by J. Benjamin Stevens | Feb 13, 2014 | 0 Comments

In an interesting family law case out of Maine, the state's Supreme Court ruled that a cell phone company broke the law when it agreed to hand over thousands of text messages in an especially contentious divorce case.

The case began when the divorce attorney for the husband subpoenaed U.S. Cellular for call and text records. Specifically, the man was after the transcript of messages exchanged between his wife and another man who he believed she was having an affair with. The husband also asked for and received messages between his wife and one of her health care providers. Surprisingly, U.S. Cellular agreed to the request and handed over 50,000 text messages to the husband.

The opinion by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, written by Justice Donald Alexander, said that U.S. Cellular broke federal privacy laws when it divulged more than 50,000 text messages in the case. The opinion especially criticized U.S. Cellular, given that a protection order had already been put into place and the couple had separated their cell phone accounts. The judge wrote that U.S. Cellular should be reported to federal prosecutors for its disclosure of text messages during divorce that was in direct violation of the federal Stored Communications Act.

Justice Alexander noted that federal law clearly says the content of text messages must not be released except for law enforcement purposes without the express consent of the customer. Even law enforcement authorities must first get a warrant before accessing the messages. Nowhere in the Stored Communications Act does the law allow for text messages to be disclosed based only on a civil discovery subpoena.

The attorney for the husband in the case who requested the messages has been suspended from the practice of law for six months, a punishment that the Supreme Court decided was necessary to demonstrate how strongly it disapproves of the tactics used in the case. The majority's opinion went on to say that as Americans we should all be more concerned with how easy it is for someone to gain access to thousands of personal and private messages. The judge's hope is that legislators take action to remedy the situation before others suffer similar harm.

Source: “50,000 Texts Handed Over in Maine Divorce Case,” by The Associated Press, published at

About the Author

J. Benjamin Stevens

Senior Partner


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.


Subscribe to our Newsletter!

second newsletter sign up

CLICK HERE to subscribe to our new monthly newsletter full of interesting news, stories, and advice to benefit you and your family.