Close X

Blog

Two Become One? How South Carolina's Common Law Marriage Doctrine Applies to Same-Sex Couples

Posted by Unknown | Jul 03, 2017 | 0 Comments

Married 20ben rosett 10609
Photo Credit: Unsplash.com/Ben Rosett

South Carolina is one of the few states recognizing common law marriage. Currently, only eight states and the District of Columbia fully recognize it.[1] The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell opened the door to same-sex common law marriage in South Carolina. There are currently only three jurisdictions officially recognizing same-sex common law marriage: Iowa, Rhode Island, and the District of Columbia.[2] However, a recent South Carolina decision could add another to the list.

What is common law marriage and how can it affect you?

This blog has previously dealt with the requirements for establishing a common law marriage in South Carolina. If those elements are met, what does it mean for same-gender couples? Those couples who have met the requirements for common law marriage since Obergefell could now be considered common law spouses, even in the absence of a formal ceremony.

What about couples who were together long before Obergefell? Were they “married” from the day they began to meet the requirements for common law marriage, however far back that was? For instance, if you have been with your partner ten years, would you be considered “married” only since June 26, 2015 (the date of Obergefell) or all the way back to when you began to fulfill the requirements? The answer could have major implications for your case, affecting everything from spousal support to the division of assets and debts.

How are South Carolina courts handling this issue?

So far, only one South Carolina case has dealt with same-sex common law marriage. In his decision earlier this year in Parks v. Lee[3], York County Family Court Judge Thomas White held that a couple who lived together for 28 years were common law spouses. Historically, if there was an impediment to the marriage, a couple could not be considered common law spouses. As Judge White noted, “[p]rior to … Obergefell, … the law of South Carolina constituted a legal impediment to common-law marriages of same-sex couples.”[4]

Since the Supreme Court held that laws forbidding same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, Judge White did not apply the previous prohibition on common law marriage for same-sex couples and held that Obergefell applied retroactively to late 1987 or early 1988 for the couple in Parks. They had held themselves out as married for over 28 years. They had a joint bank account, bought a home as co-mortgagors, and claimed each other as dependents on tax returns. Therefore, Judge White found a rebuttable presumption of common law marriage and said the spouse denying such a marriage failed to meet her burden proving otherwise.

This area of law is rapidly developing, and at some point in the future, our State Supreme Court will likely have to weigh in on what point in time same-sex couples can be considered common law spouses. Stay tuned for further developments.

Our attorneys keep up with developing trends in domestic litigation, such as this one, in South Carolina and around the country. We represent all types of families in all types of situations, and we would be glad to put our knowledge to use for you. The Stevens Firm, P.A. - Family Law Center has provided exceptional legal counsel and support to families throughout South Carolina for over two decades. We are well-equipped to handle all divorce and family law matters, no matter your circumstances. Contact us to schedule an initial consultation.

[1] http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/common-law-marriage.html

[2] Id.

[3] York County Family Court, Case No. 2016-DR-45-1061 (2016).

[4] Id.

About the Author

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Twitter

Subscribe to our Newsletter!

Sign 20up 202

CLICK HERE to subscribe to our new monthly newsletter full of interesting news, stories, and advice to benefit you and your family.